Challegens of Migration in Context of Cosmopolitan Citizenship

  • Flor Maria Avila Hernández Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca, Bogotà

Abstract

This article analyzes the different challenges of citizenship and rights in front of the new forms of flow migrations, especially in the Mediterranean and the case of Venezuelan migrants. The  new conception of globalization and Soveranity redefines the relations between the State and individuals, whether national or foreign, and must be the basis for rethinking the new issues of citizenship, of migrants and of dialogue between cultures, which must be addressed from the so-called "ethics" of hospitality "and based on the principles of interculturality, the good universality of human rights and substantive and cosmopolitan citizenship. In the expansion of the universal quantifier of human rights, at the time of the nomination of constitutional states of law, there are limitations on the universalist conception, whose archetypal point is based on the thesis of ontological monism. By virtue of this the correspondence between rights, guarantees and benefits were anchored in the course of the forms of government and State in the idea of homogeneity that appeared with the apogee of the nation - states, giving rise to the figure of the monism of the state. Venezuelan forced migration in the Latin America area points out the crisis of the theory of National state and forced to a new concept of citizenship.Starting from this case study, several other aspects of migrations and, more in general, of emerging human rights are addressed in this issue of the Journal of Mediterranean Knowledge.

Keywords: Cosmopolitan citizenship, Modern migrations, Emerging human rights, Venezuelan refugees

 

References

Dal Lago, A. (1999). Non-Persone. L’esclusione dei migranti in una so¬cietà globale. Milan: Feltrinelli.

Ferrajoli, L. (2004). Derechos y garantías La ley del más débil.Madrid: Trotta.

Galeotti, A.E. (1994). La Tolleranza. Una proposta pluralista. Naples: Liguori.

Galeotti, A.E. (2000). I diritti collettivi.In E. Vitale (ed.), Diritti umani e diritti delle minoranze. Problemieticipoliticigiuridici. Turin: Rosenberg &Sellier.

Hylland, T. (2014). Global citizenchip and the challenge from cultural relativism. In A. Sterri, Global citizen. Challenges and responsability in an interconnected world (pp. 53-60). Rotterdam: Sense publishers.

IACHR (2017a). IACHR express its concern for the situation of migrants from Venezuela and calls region’s states to adopt measures for their protection. Press release. www.oas.org/es/cidh/ prensa/comunicados//2017/006.asp, retrieved 16 November 2018.

IACHR (2017b). IACHR salutes the measures to offer protection Venezuelan migrants in Peru and calls regional states to implement measures for their protection. Press release. www.oas.org /es/cidh/prensa/comunicados//2017/043.asp, retrieved 16 November 2018.

Innerarity, D. (2001) Etica de la hospitalidad. Barcelona: Peninsula

Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

National Migration Superintendence (2017). The government expanded the temporary permanence permit PTP for Venezuelan citizens. www.migraciones.gob.pe.index.php/ gobierno-amplio-el-permiso-temporal-de-permanencia-ptp-para-los-ciudadanos-venezolanos/, retrieved 12 November 2018.

Onorato, P. (1989). Per uno statuto dello straniero. Democrazia e di¬ritto, 6, 303-328.

Quadros, J. (2012). O estado plurinacional e o direito internacional moderno.Curitiba: Jurúa.

Waldron, J. (2003). Cultural identity and civic responsability. In W.N. Kymlicka, Citizenship in diverse societies (pp. 155 - 174). New York: Oxford University Press.

Published
2018-12-11