I saperi del Mediterraneo per il futuro dell’Europa
Abstract
Innovation starts from the “Mediterranean Knowledgeâ€, and develops until it becomes common practice. These new ideas (products, services, and models) make it then possible to meet social needs (more effectively than their alternatives) and at the same time create new social relationships or new collaborations. Moreover, they enable to lay the foundations for the construction of a real and different European identity. The knowledge and cultural values of the Mediterranean “must†provide the driving force to overcome the impasse impeding the whole of Europe. They can become the fruitful stimulus for reviewing European policies (in particular integration ones) and provide a solid foundation for the protection and promotion of effective cultural heritage an knowledge matching up with our time, able to bring out a new future by the legacy of the different cultures.Â
References
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.
Assmann, J. (1992). Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und Poli-tische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.
Atkinson, G., Dietz, S. & Neumayer, E. (2007). Handbook of Sustainable Deve-lopment. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing.
Augé, M. (1992). Non-lieux. Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Paris : Seiul.
Badie, B. (1995). La fin des territoires. Essai sur le désordre international et sur l’utilité sociale du respect. Paris : Fayard.
Baumann, G. (1999). The Multiculturalism Riddle. Rethinking National, Ethnic, and Religious Identities. New York-London: Routledge.
Beck, U. & Grande, E. (2004). Das kosmopolitische Europa. Gesellschaft und Po-litik in der Zweiten Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday & Co.
Bevir, M. & Rhodes, R.A.W. (2006). Governance Stories. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (2013). In Praise of Sociology: Acceptance Speech for the Gold Medal of the CNRS. Sociology, 47(1): 7-14 (trad. it., Elogio della sociologia (1993). Il discorso di ringraziamento per la medaglia d’oro del CNRS. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, LIV, 1: 139-148).
Calabrò, D. (2015, in print). Xénoi. Il controcanto dell’Europa. In E. Mangone & G. Masullo (eds), L’Altro da Sé. Ri-comporre le differenze (pp. 85-99). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Cassano, F. & Zolo, D. (a cura di) (2007). L’alternativa mediterranea. Milano: Feltrinelli.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cuche, D. (1996). La notion de culture dans les sciences socials. Paris: La Décou-verte. (trad. it., La nozione di cultura nelle scienze sociali. Bologna: il Mulino, 2003).
Dahrendorf, R. (1988). The Modern Social Conflict. An Essay on the Politics of Liberty. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
David, P.A. (1994). Why are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’? Path Depend-ence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organization and Institutions. Structu-ral Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2): 205-220.
de Varine, H. (2002). Les racines du futur. Chalon sur Saone : Asdic.
Donat,i P. (2011). Modernization and relational reflexivity. International Review of Sociology - Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 21(1): 21-39.
Drucler, P.F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. London-New York: Routledge.
Durkheim, E. (1893). De la division du travail social. Paris, Alcan.
Eder, K. & Giesen, B. (Eds) (2001). European Citizenship beteween National Legacies and Postnational Project. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Etzioni, A. (Ed.) (1995). The New Communitarian Thinking: Persons, Virtues, In-stitutions and Communities. Charlottesville-London: University Press of Vir-ginia.
Farr, R.M. & Moscovici, S. (Eds) (1984). Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferrarotti, F. (1997). L’Italia tra storia e memoria. Appartenenza e identità . Roma: Donzelli.
Gasparini, A. (2000). La sociologia degli spazi. Luoghi, città , società . Roma: Ca-rocci.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Polity: Cambridge.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City: Dou-bleday.
Goffman, E. (1983). The Interaction Order. American Sociological Review, 48(1): 1-17.
Griswold, W. (1994). Culture and Societies in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks Pine Forge Press.
Gudykunst, W.B. & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and Interpersonal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
Halbwachs, M. (1968). La mémoire collective. Paris: PUF.
Hall, S. (1997). The Centrality of Culture: Notes on the Cultural Revolutions of Our Time. In K. Thompson (Ed.), Media e Cultural Regulation (pp. 207-238). London: Sage.
Hannerz, U. (1996). Transnational Connections. Culture, People, Places. New York-London: Routledge.
Jedlowski, P. (2002). Memoria, esperienza e modernità . Memorie e società nel XX secolo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Jonas, H. (1979). Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die techno-logische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Insel.
Kjær, A.M. (2011). Rhodes’ contribution to governance. Theory: praise, criticism and the future Governance debate. Public Administration, 89(1): 101-113.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London : Sage.
Lévy, P. (1994). L’intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberspace. Paris : Éditions La Découverte.
Liebowitz, J. (1999). Knowledge Management-Handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Maffesoli, M. (1985). La connaissance ordinaire. Précis de sociologie compréhensive. Paris: Librairie des Méridiens.
Magnier, A. & Russo, P. (2002). Sociologia dei sistemi urbani. Bologna: il Mulino.
Mander, J. & Goldsmith, E. (1996). A Case Against the Glocal economy and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco: Sierra Club Book.
Mangone, E. & Marsico, G. (2011). Social Representations and Valorial Orienta-tions: The Immigrants Case. Memorandum, 20: 211-224.
Mangone, E. (2001). L’azione politica dell’Ente e il welfare locale. Qualità sociale, 17: 26-34.
Mangone, E. (2012). Persona, conoscenza, società . Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Manville, P.B. (1996). Harvest Your Workers’ Knowledge. Datamation, 42: 78-80.
Martell, L. (2010). The sociology of globalization. Polity: Cambridge.
Matvejević, P. (2013). Breviario Mediterraneo. Milano: Garzanti.
Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse: son image et son public. Paris : PUF.
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. & Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Inno-vation. London: NESTA.
Ohmae, K. (1995). The end of the Nation State:the Rise of Regional Economics. New York: The Free Press.
Pesenti, L. (2001). Il ritorno della comunità . Kéiron, 6(1): 134-141.
Piaget, J. (1972). L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires. In OCDE (Ed.), L’interdisciplinarité: problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche dans les uni-versités. Paris : OCDE. Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.fondationjeanpiaget.ch/fjp/site/textes/VE/jp72_epist_relat_interdis.pdf, consultato il 20/06/2015.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Resta, C. (2012). Geofilosofia del Mediterraneo. Messina: Misogea.
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization. Sage: London.
Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: why global markets, states, and de-mocracy can’t coexist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schütz, A. (1946). The Well-informed Citizen. An Essay on the Social Distribution of Knowledge. Social Research, 14(4): 463-478 (trad. it., Il cittadino ben in-formato: saggio sulla distribuzione sociale della conoscenza. In A. Schütz, Saggi sociologici. Torino: Utet, 1979).
Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and Famines; An Essay on Entitlement and Devolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (2003). Democracy and Its Global Roots. Why Democratization is not the same as Westernization. October 6, The New Republic: 28-35 (trad. it., La de-mocrazia degli altri. Perchè la libertà non è un’invenzione dell’Occidente. Mi-lano: Mondadori, 2004).
Sharan, S. (1994). Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods. Westpoint: Greenwood Press.
Stewart, T.A. (1997),. Intellectual Capital. How the Knowledge economy is creat-ing new challenges for corporations & new opportunities for the people who work for them. New York: Dobleday.
Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Leipzig: Reisland.
Young, R. (2001). Post-colonialism: a Historical Introduction. Blackwell: London.
Zoll, R. (2000). Was ist solidarität heute?. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag.
Authors who publish in this Working Papers Series agree with the following points:
- The author(s) guarantee(s) that the article is original and that it has not been previously published nor sent to other series for consideration.
- The author(s) declare(s) that the article does not violate the copyright of third parties and assume(s) the full personal and financial responsibility for any legal action which may be brought by third parties against the ICSR Mediterranean Knowledge
- The author(s) retain(s) the rights. The ICSR Mediterranean Knowledge is allowed to publish the work in digital edition with the licence Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) or in any other form that the publisher considers opportune. The licence allows others to share the work, provided that the authorship and the initial publication in this Working Paper Series are reported.
- The authors can establish other arrangements with non-exclusive license to distribute the published version of the article (eg. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), indicating that it was first published in the Working Papers Series of the ICSR Mediterranean Knowledge
- The author(s) can distribute the article online (eg. on their website) only after that it is published by the Working Papers Series (see The Effect of Open Access).
