Gender Dualism between Platitudes and Half-truths
Abstract
In modern economic systems, discrimination – and the resulting allocative inefficiency – occurs when “individuals with the same economic characteristics receive different wages and the differences are systematically correlated with certain non-economic characteristics of the individual” (Stiglitz, 1973). A significant example of this is occupational segregation: the gender stereotypes from which it originates reduce the efficiency of the economic system and the prospects for development, determining, on the one hand, under-utilization of the female workforce and, on the other, a distortion in the investment in human capital (Hartmann, 1976). The former can be translated in terms of the gender pay gap (articulation of the more general global gender gap index) even though there has long been a decrease in the gap in the employment rate (World Economic Forum, 2018, 2019, 2020). Female employment remains more concentrated in precarious, low-skilled, and therefore low-paid jobs. This depends not only on the glass ceiling (which hinders the careers of professional women) but also on a greater inequality among women themselves, between high-skilled and low-skilled workers (Saraceno 2015, 2017). It entails the risk of producing feedback effects that not only perpetuate the gender gap but feed, within the female population, the same dynamics found between men and women. On these premises, this paper investigates how two factors - the widening economic gaps and the crisis of the last decade - have impacted on the gender gap trend. We will also consider the consequent structural and socio-cultural changes.
References
Albertini, M. (2009). Italia 2020: la ricetta del governo è il familismo, «lavoce.info», Retrieved December 30, 2009, from http://archivio.lavoce.info.
Bauman Z. (2005). Liquid Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bolzani, O., Buonapace, N. et al. (2010). L’emancipazione malata. Sguardi femministi sul lavoro che cambia. Milano: Edizioni Libera Università delle Donne.
Bonomi, G., Brosio, G., Di Tommaso. M.L. (2013). The Impact of Gender Quotas on Votes for Women Candidates: Evidence from Italy. Feminist Economics, 19 (4), 48-75.
Castells, M. (2002). Il potere delle identità. Milano: Editrice Egea.
Charles, M. (1992). Cross national variation in occupation sex segregation. American Sociological Review, 57(4), 483-602.
CNEL. (2012). Rapporto sul mercato del lavoro. Roma.
De Pascali, P., Forges Davanzati, G. (2014). Le politiche di austerità, i divari regionali e l’occupazione femminile: uno schema di causazione cumulativa. Discussion Paper RESeT, n. 4.
Dire - Agenzia di stampa nazionale (2018). Disparità di genere, Italia fanalino di coda in Europa nel 2018. Retrieved from http://www.dire.it/19-12-2018/274622-disparita-di-genere-italia-fanalino-di-coda-in-europa-nel-2018/
Dugger, W.M. (1996) (ed.). Inequality: Radical Institutionalists Views on Race, Gender, Class and Nation. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
Eige (2014). La partecipazione delle donne alla vita politica e istituzionale. Rapporto annuale 2013. Ufficio delle pubblicazioni dell’Unione europea, Lussemburgo. Retrieved from www.camera.it
Etui (2018). Benchmarking Working Europe 2018. ETUI aisbl: Brussels.
Fiorani, E. (2003). La nuova condizione di vita. Lavoro, corpo, territorio. Milano: Lupetti.
Fumagalli, A. (2007). Bioeconomia e capitalismo cognitivo. Verso un nuovo paradigma di accumulazione? Roma: Carocci.
Gallino, L. (2012). La lotta di classe dopo la lotta di classe. Laterza: Roma-Bari.
Gambardella, D., Morlicchio, E. (2005) (eds). Familismo forzato. Scambi di risorse e coabitazione nelle famiglie povere a Napoli. Roma: Carocci.
Grimshaw, D., Rubery, J., (2007). Undervaluing women's work. Working Paper Series, European Work and Employment Research Centre, University of Manchester, n. 53.
Gilman, C.P. (1998 [1898]). Women and Economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hartmann, H. (1976). Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex, in M. Blaxall and B. Reagan (eds.). Women and workplace: The implication of the Occupational Segregation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Isfol (2005). Rapporto di ricerca PLUS 2005. Soveria Mannelli: Rubettino Editore.
Istat (2013). Lavoro e conciliazione dei tempi di vita. Rapporto BES 2013: il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. Retrieved from https://www.istat.it/it/files/2013/03/3_lavoro-conciliazione.pdf
Istat (2015a). Rapporto annuale. Roma.
Istat (2015b). Come cambia la vita delle donne. Roma.
Istat (2016). Le dinamiche del mercato del lavoro: una lettura per generazione. Rapporto annuale, 104-151. Retrieved from https://www.istat.it/it/files/2016/04/Cap_3_Ra2016.pdf
Istat (2017). Indagine conoscitiva sulle politiche in materia di parità tra donne e uomini. Audizione del Presidente dell’Istituto nazionale di statistica, Giorgio Alleva. Retrieved from https://www.istat.it/it/files//2017/10/A-Audizione-parit%C3%A0-di-genere-25ottobre_definitivo.pdf
Istat (2020). Misure a sostegno della partecipazione delle donne al mercato del lavoro e per la conciliazione delle esigenze di vita e di lavoro. Audizione dell’Istituto nazionale di statistica, Linda Laura Sabbadini, Retreived Febrary 26, 2020 from
https://www.istat.it/it/files/2020/02/Memoria_Istat_Audizione-26-febbraio-2020.pdf
Krugman, P. (2002). For Richer, New York Times. Retrieved from www.pkarchive.org/economy/ForRicher.html
Marcuzzo, M.C., Rosselli, A. (2008). The history of economic thought through gender lens. F. Bettio, A. Verashchagina (eds). Frontiers in the Economics of gender. London: Routledge.
Martini, E., Vespasiano, F., (2013). Bodies and Emotions: Sources of Biocapitalism. New Atlantis, 1-2013 (July), special issue Palermo WCSA II Conference Proceedings (second part), 79-98.
Morini, C., La femminilizzazione del lavoro nel capitalismo cognitivo, Retreived March 29, 2019 from https://www.google.com/search?q=la+femminilizzazione+del+lavoro+cristina+morini&oq=la+femminilizz&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l3j69i57j0l2.3275j1j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Morini, C. (2010). Per amore o per forza. Femminilizzazione del lavoro e biopolitiche del corpo. Milano: Ombre Corte.
Myrdal, G. (1996 [1944]). An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy, New York, Pantheon Books, 1996 [1944] - Appendix 5 «A parallel to the Negro Problem».
OECD (2012). Gender equality in Employment, in Closer the gendar gap. Act Now. Paris: OECD Publishing
Paulì, G. (2014). Le “questioni di genere” nel pensiero di Thorstein Veblen. Itinerari di Ricerca Storica, Anno XXVII, 2.
Piazzalunga, D., Di Tommaso, M.L. (2015).The Increase Of The Gender Wage Gap In Italy During The 2008-2012 Economic Crisis, «Carlo Alberto Notebooks», n. 426. Retrieved from www.carloalberto.org/assets/working-papers/no.426.pdf
Reich M. (2008), Segmented Labour Market and Labour Mobility, Northampton Massachusetts, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Robeyns, I., (1994). Sen’s Capability Approach And Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9 (2-3): 61-92.
Rubery, J., Grimshaw, D., Figueiredo, H. (2005). How to Close the Gender Pay Gap in Europe: Towards the Gender Mainstreaming of Pay Policy. Industrial Relations Journal, 36 (3): 184‐213.
Saraceno, C. (2013). Il welfare. Collana “Farsi un’idea”. Bologna: il Mulino.
Saraceno, C. (2015). Il lavoro non basta. La povertà in Europa negli anni della crisi. Milano: Feltrinelli.
Saraceno, C. (2017). L’equivoco della famiglia. Roma: Laterza.
Sassen, S. (2002). Globalizzati e scontenti. Il destino delle minoranze nel nuovo ordine mondiale. Milano: Il Saggiatore (or. 1998).
Stiglitz, J.E. (1973). Approaches to the Economics of Discrimination. American Economic Review, 63 (2) 287-295.
Strober, M.H. (1994). Rethinking Economics Through a Feminist Lens. American Economic Review, 84(2): 143-147.
Svimez (2012). La condizione e il ruolo della donna, per lo sviluppo del Sud, Rapporto SVIMEZ, Roma.
Tilman, R. (2003). The Legacy of Thorstein Veblen. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, vol. I.
Tilman, R. (2004). Thorstein Veblen, John Dewey, C. Wright Mills and the Generic Ends of Life, Lahan Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Veblen, T.B. (1934 [1894]). The economic Theory of Woman Dress. L. Ardzrooni). Essay in our Changing order. New York: Viking, 65-77.
Veblen, T.B. (1934[1899]). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. NewYork: The Modern Library.
Vercellone, C. (ed.) (2006). Capitalismo Cognitivo. Roma: Manifestolibri.
Vincenti, A. (2012). Il welfare state tra mutamento sociale e uguaglianza di genere. B. Pezzini (ed.). La costruzione del genere, norme e regole, Bergamo: Sestante Edizioni.
World Economic Forum (2018, 2019, 2020). The Global Gender Gap Report 2018, 2019, 2020. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following points:
- The author(s) guarantee(s) that the article is original and that it has not previously published nor sent to other journals for consideration.
- The author(s) declare(s) that the article does not violate the copyright of third parties and assume(s) the full personal and financial responsibility for any legal action which may be brought by third parties against the ICSR Mediterranean Knowledge
- The author(s) retain(s) the rights of the article. The ICSR Mediterranean Knowledge is allowed to publish it in digital edition with licence Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) or in any other form that the publisher considers opportune. The licence allows others to share the article, provided that the authorship and the initial publication in this journal are reported.
- The author(s) can establish arrangements with non-exclusive license to distribute the published version of the article (eg. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), indicating that it was first published in the Journal of Mediterranean Knoweldge.
- The author(s) can distribute the work online (eg. on their website) only after that it is published by the Journal of Mediterranean Knoweldge (see The Effect of Open Access).
